Author(s) / Editor(s):
Stepanenko Viktor Petrovich, Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Chief Research Fellow, Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
Email: vikstepa@gmail.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3623-0057
Year: 2024
Pages: 151–170
Publication language: Ukrainian
Publisher: Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Type of Publication: chapter in edited volume
Publication Place: Kyiv
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/book3.978-617-14-0292-8.05
The section examines several key aspects and characteristics of solidarity relations in Ukraine during the period of protracted war. The analysis is based on a dedicated set of items included in the 2024 monitoring survey conducted by the Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. The principal findings of the study can be summarized as follows: 1) The degree of expected solidaristic support at the basic social level – coming from the everyday social environment of citizens – shows a generally positive balance in respondents’ self-assessments, with only minor regional variations. 2) An overwhelming majority of respondents demonstrate a high level of concern and personal involvement regarding Ukraine’s future. 3) Perceptions of a civic (political) Ukrainian nation serve as an essential foundation for a pro-European and democratic model of solidarity in contemporary Ukrainian society. 4) The war has predominantly strengthened paternalistic orientations within Ukrainian society, thereby reinforcing a paternalistically grounded socio-economic model of solidarity, in which public expectations are largely directed toward the state’s responsibility to provide social protection and support.
References:
Lebid, N. (2024). "A de pid chas viiny buv ty?" Sotsioloh Volodymyr Paniotto - pro novi linii podilu ukraintsiv. 20 bereznia. https://glavcom.ua/interviews/natsija-optimistiv-sotsioloh-volodimir-paniotto-namaljuvav-portret-ukrajintsiv-chasiv-vijni-991063.html#google_vignette
Reznik, V. (2023). Viina y ukrainska sotsietalna spilnota: dynamika lehitymatsii ta solidaryzatsii. In Ye. Holovakha & S. Makeiev (Eds.), Ukrainske suspilstvo v umovakh viiny. Rik 2023: Kolektyvna monohrafiia (pp. 45-86). Kyiv: Instytut sotsiolohii NAN Ukrainy.
Abela, A. M. (2004). Solidarity and religion in the European Union: A comparative sociological perspective. In P. G. Xuereb (Ed.), The Value(s) of a Constitution for Europe (pp. 71-101). European Documentation and Research Centre, University of Malta.
Arnsperger, C., & Varoufakis, Y. (2003). Toward a theory of solidarity. Erkenntnis, 59(2), 157-188. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024630228818
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024630228818
Arts, W., & Gelissen, J. (2001). Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles: Does the type really matter? Acta Sociologica, 44(4), 283-300. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169930104400401
https://doi.org/10.1177/000169930104400401
De Beer, P., & Koster, F. (2009). Sticking together or falling apart? Solidarity in an era of individualization and globalization. Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789089641281
https://doi.org/10.5117/9789089641281
Janmaat, G. J., & Braun, R. (2009). Diversity and postmaterialism as rival perspectives in accounting for social solidarity: Evidence from international surveys. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 50(1), 39-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715208100969
https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715208100969
Rusu, H. (2014). Measuring social solidarity: Some research notes. Social Change Review, 10(1), 71-90. https://doi.org/10.2478/scr-2013-0012
https://doi.org/10.2478/scr-2013-0012
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2023). SHARP, Wave 2: Big picture report. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2024-01/tzvacb-rep_pfrukr21_sharp-big-picture-report_v11.pdf
Stjernø, S. (2004). Solidarity in Europe: The history of an idea. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490378
